Triple

T887392
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Social Trinitarianism E19160 entity
Predicate usesAnalogy P3882 FINISHED
Object social analogies LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: social analogies | Statement: [Social Trinitarianism, usesAnalogy, social analogies]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: usesAnalogy
Context triple: [Social Trinitarianism, usesAnalogy, social analogies]
  • A. usedAsAnalogFor chosen
    Indicates that one entity is employed as a comparison or illustrative counterpart to help explain, represent, or understand another entity.
  • B. usedToExplain
    Indicates that one entity serves as an explanation or clarification for another entity.
  • C. primaryMetaphor
    Indicates a fundamental conceptual mapping where one domain (often concrete or physical) is systematically understood in terms of another (often abstract), forming a basic metaphorical relationship between them.
  • D. usedAgainst
    Indicates that one entity is employed, applied, or deployed in opposition to, or for the purpose of affecting, another entity.
  • E. oftenContrastedWith
    Indicates that one entity is frequently compared to another in a way that highlights their differences or opposing characteristics.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69a4939c32488190a7ccd41cf0abb22b completed March 1, 2026, 7:29 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69a4ae787bf081909533082ca013624a completed March 1, 2026, 9:24 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69a4aa8ff8c48190a33b00acf65c1276 completed March 1, 2026, 9:07 p.m.
Created at: March 1, 2026, 7:39 p.m.