Triple

T8869809
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Michael Price E211122 entity
Predicate roleInSherlock P85449 FINISHED
Object co-composer of the score LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: co-composer of the score | Statement: [Michael Price, roleInSherlock, co-composer of the score]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: roleInSherlock
Context triple: [Michael Price, roleInSherlock, co-composer of the score]
  • A. detectiveType
    Indicates that one entity is classified as a particular type or category of detective in relation to another entity.
  • B. hasFictionalDetective
    Indicates that one entity (typically a work or series) features or includes a fictional detective character as part of its content.
  • C. roleInCrime
    Indicates the specific function, responsibility, or participation an entity has within the commission of a particular crime.
  • D. questionedCharacter
    Indicates that one entity directed questions or an interrogation toward another entity.
  • E. notableSuspect
    Indicates that an individual is a particularly significant or prominent suspect in relation to an event, case, or investigation.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69ca838d3c7c8190a849566d5afd2b11 completed March 30, 2026, 2:07 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69cc61257a548190955ad71f4c8704d5 completed April 1, 2026, 12:04 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69cc5c2956788190a311c647b4da17a6 completed March 31, 2026, 11:43 p.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69cc5d6e54808190af4156edd4c8ffbc completed March 31, 2026, 11:49 p.m.
Created at: March 30, 2026, 6:51 p.m.