Triple
T8867319
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Samuel Blatchford |
E211050
|
entity |
| Predicate | confirmedToSupremeCourtOn |
P85094
|
FINISHED |
| Object | 1882-03-22 |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: 1882-03-22 | Statement: [Samuel Blatchford, confirmedToSupremeCourtOn, 1882-03-22]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: confirmedToSupremeCourtOn Context triple: [Samuel Blatchford, confirmedToSupremeCourtOn, 1882-03-22]
-
A.
openedAsSupremeCourt
Indicates that an institution or court began its operation specifically in the capacity or status of a supreme court.
-
B.
partyStatusAtSupremeCourt
Indicates the legal status or role a party holds in a case when it is before the Supreme Court.
-
C.
supremeCourtOf
Indicates that one entity serves as the highest judicial authority (supreme court) within the jurisdiction or legal system of another entity.
-
D.
supremeCourtActionOnLowerCourt
Indicates an action taken by a supreme court regarding a decision or proceeding from a lower court, such as reviewing, affirming, reversing, or remanding it.
-
E.
succeededInSupremeCourtSeatBy
Indicates that one individual directly followed another in occupying the same seat on the Supreme Court.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69ca838d3c7c8190a849566d5afd2b11 |
completed | March 30, 2026, 2:07 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69cc6108530c819084559f4de669ce20 |
completed | April 1, 2026, 12:04 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69cc5c279ea481908c71756f694b66bf |
completed | March 31, 2026, 11:43 p.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69cc5cffe8ec819084c12770fe0578f2 |
completed | March 31, 2026, 11:47 p.m. |
Created at: March 30, 2026, 6:51 p.m.