Triple

T8860114
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject RFC 1446 E210864 entity
Predicate obsoletedBy P101 FINISHED
Object RFC 1905 E39636 NE FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: RFC 1905 | Statement: [RFC 1446, obsoletedBy, RFC 1905]
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: RFC 1905
Context triple: [RFC 1446, obsoletedBy, RFC 1905]
  • A. RFC 1905 chosen
    RFC 1905 is an Internet standards document that specifies the protocol operations for the Simple Network Management Protocol version 2 (SNMPv2).
  • B. RFC 1907
    RFC 1907 is an earlier Internet standard that defined the Management Information Base (MIB) for SNMPv2, later superseded by RFC 3418.
  • C. RFC 1901
    RFC 1901 is an IETF standards document that specifies the community-based version of the Simple Network Management Protocol, commonly known as SNMPv2c.
  • D. RFC 1904
    RFC 1904 is an Internet standards document that originally defined the textual conventions for SNMPv2 before later being superseded by RFC 3410.
  • E. RFC 1906
    RFC 1906 is an Internet standard that specifies the transport mappings for SNMPv2, detailing how SNMP messages are carried over various network protocols.
  • F. None of above.
  • G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69ca838bbddc8190ab546d737e5d350f completed March 30, 2026, 2:07 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69cc60e712d08190bfb1c4ba3acaea90 completed April 1, 2026, 12:03 a.m.
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) batch_69cfa0b94f5481909902b5fa405a502f completed April 3, 2026, 11:12 a.m.
Created at: March 30, 2026, 6:50 p.m.