Triple
T8858210
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | David Blunt |
E210814
|
entity |
| Predicate | workLocation |
P7
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Doncaster |
E123073
|
NE FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Doncaster | Statement: [David Blunt, workLocation, Doncaster]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Doncaster Context triple: [David Blunt, workLocation, Doncaster]
-
A.
Doncaster
chosen
Doncaster is a large town and metropolitan borough in South Yorkshire, England, known historically for its railway heritage, horse racing, and role as a regional commercial center.
-
B.
Yorkton
Yorkton is a small city in southeastern Saskatchewan, Canada, known as a regional hub for agriculture and services.
-
C.
Scunthorpe
Scunthorpe is an industrial town in North Lincolnshire, England, historically known for its steel production.
-
D.
Wakefield
Wakefield is a historic cathedral city in West Yorkshire, Northern England, known for its medieval heritage and role as an administrative and commercial center in the region.
-
E.
Wakefield
Wakefield is a picturesque village in western Quebec, Canada, known for its historic covered bridge, arts community, and scenic setting along the Gatineau River.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69ca838bbddc8190ab546d737e5d350f |
completed | March 30, 2026, 2:07 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69cc60e3b62c8190bf779e7e1db767f6 |
completed | April 1, 2026, 12:03 a.m. |
| NED1 | Entity disambiguation (via context triple) | batch_69cfab8fef348190a25e978085e8e656 |
completed | April 3, 2026, 11:59 a.m. |
Created at: March 30, 2026, 6:50 p.m.