Triple

T8857176
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Symphony No. 5 in C-sharp minor E210785 entity
Predicate hasTonalityShift P85014 FINISHED
Object ends in D major LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: ends in D major | Statement: [Symphony No. 5 in C-sharp minor, hasTonalityShift, ends in D major]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasTonalityShift
Context triple: [Symphony No. 5 in C-sharp minor, hasTonalityShift, ends in D major]
  • A. tonalCharacteristic
    Indicates the specific quality or character of a sound’s tone, such as its color, texture, or expressive nuance, in relation to an entity.
  • B. hasPhonemicTone
    Indicates that a language, word, or syllable uses pitch differences (tones) as phonemic contrasts that can change meaning.
  • C. isToneNeutral
    Indicates that the tone of the referenced content is neither positive nor negative, but emotionally neutral or unbiased.
  • D. contributesToTone
    Indicates that one entity plays a role in shaping, influencing, or determining the overall tone or mood of another entity.
  • E. tonal
    Indicates that one entity has a tone, pitch pattern, or tonal quality in relation to another (such as a language, sound, or musical element).
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69ca838bbddc8190ab546d737e5d350f completed March 30, 2026, 2:07 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69cc60e259248190abd334bbfcdcb955 completed April 1, 2026, 12:03 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69cc5c279ea481908c71756f694b66bf completed March 31, 2026, 11:43 p.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69cc5cffe8ec819084c12770fe0578f2 completed March 31, 2026, 11:47 p.m.
Created at: March 30, 2026, 6:50 p.m.