Triple
T8857131
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Symphony No. 4 in G major |
E210784
|
entity |
| Predicate | typicalVoiceTypeInFinale |
P46281
|
FINISHED |
| Object | lyric soprano |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: lyric soprano | Statement: [Symphony No. 4 in G major, typicalVoiceTypeInFinale, lyric soprano]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: typicalVoiceTypeInFinale Context triple: [Symphony No. 4 in G major, typicalVoiceTypeInFinale, lyric soprano]
-
A.
voiceType
Indicates the specific vocal style, quality, or role associated with an entity’s voice in a given context.
-
B.
typicalNumberOfVoices
Indicates the usual or characteristic number of distinct voices or parts involved in performing or realizing something (such as a musical work or texture).
-
C.
vocalHarmonyType
Indicates the specific kind or style of vocal harmony relationship that exists between the involved vocal parts or voices.
-
D.
hasNotableVocalType
chosen
Indicates that an entity is associated with a specific, noteworthy type or quality of vocalization or voice.
-
E.
vocalRange
Indicates the span of pitches or notes that an entity (such as a singer or instrument) is capable of producing.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69ca838bbddc8190ab546d737e5d350f |
completed | March 30, 2026, 2:07 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69cc60e259248190abd334bbfcdcb955 |
completed | April 1, 2026, 12:03 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69cc5c279ea481908c71756f694b66bf |
completed | March 31, 2026, 11:43 p.m. |
Created at: March 30, 2026, 6:50 p.m.