Triple
T8853844
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Dakota Territory |
E210702
|
entity |
| Predicate | capital |
P234
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Yankton |
E447486
|
NE FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Yankton | Statement: [Dakota Territory, capital, Yankton]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Yankton Context triple: [Dakota Territory, capital, Yankton]
-
A.
Yankton
chosen
Yankton are a Native American group that forms one of the principal divisions of the Dakota (Sioux) people, traditionally living in the Upper Midwest region of the United States.
-
B.
Mandan
The Mandan are a Native American tribe of the Northern Plains, historically known as semi-sedentary village farmers and traders along the upper Missouri River in present-day North Dakota.
-
C.
Madison, South Dakota
Madison, South Dakota is a small city in eastern South Dakota known as a regional hub for education, technology, and agriculture.
-
D.
Columbia, South Dakota
Columbia, South Dakota is a small rural town located in northeastern South Dakota within Brown County.
-
E.
Hudson, South Dakota
Hudson, South Dakota is a small rural town located in southeastern South Dakota near the Iowa border.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69ca838a424c8190b1ecac115c2927e7 |
completed | March 30, 2026, 2:07 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69cc60c6dce88190b175698b191fb89b |
completed | April 1, 2026, 12:03 a.m. |
| NED1 | Entity disambiguation (via context triple) | batch_69cfa09557dc81908b5690bf5c392528 |
completed | April 3, 2026, 11:12 a.m. |
Created at: March 30, 2026, 6:49 p.m.