Triple
T8852322
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | DHCPREQUEST |
E210666
|
entity |
| Predicate | mayContainOption |
P53912
|
FINISHED |
| Object | DHCP Message Type option |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: DHCP Message Type option | Statement: [DHCPREQUEST, mayContainOption, DHCP Message Type option]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: mayContainOption Context triple: [DHCPREQUEST, mayContainOption, DHCP Message Type option]
-
A.
providesOption
Indicates that one entity makes a particular choice, alternative, or configuration available to another entity.
-
B.
mayPresent
Indicates that one entity is permitted or authorized to present, display, or introduce another entity or item.
-
C.
mayIncludeFeature
chosen
Indicates that one entity is allowed or able to contain, incorporate, or be associated with a particular feature.
-
D.
mustContain
Indicates that one entity is required to include or have within it another specified entity or element.
-
E.
optionedBy
Indicates that the rights to develop, produce, or exploit something (such as a work, property, or asset) have been contractually secured by a particular party.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69ca838a424c8190b1ecac115c2927e7 |
completed | March 30, 2026, 2:07 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69cc60c3c5548190926e374bbe592180 |
completed | April 1, 2026, 12:03 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69cc5c25b874819084c9ba391703e066 |
completed | March 31, 2026, 11:43 p.m. |
Created at: March 30, 2026, 6:49 p.m.