Triple
T8849538
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Weber River |
E210601
|
entity |
| Predicate | flowsThrough |
P225
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Davis County |
E321395
|
NE FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Davis County | Statement: [Weber River, flowsThrough, Davis County]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Davis County Context triple: [Weber River, flowsThrough, Davis County]
-
A.
Davis County
chosen
Davis County is a populous county in northern Utah, situated between the Great Salt Lake and the Wasatch Range and forming part of the greater Salt Lake City metropolitan area.
-
B.
Morgan County
Morgan County is a rural county in northeastern Colorado known for its agricultural economy and small communities centered around the city of Fort Morgan.
-
C.
Morgan County
Morgan County is a county in northern Alabama known for its seat in Decatur and its role in the Huntsville-Decatur metropolitan area.
-
D.
Morgan County
Morgan County is a rural county in northern Utah known for its mountainous terrain, outdoor recreation, and small-town communities northeast of Salt Lake City.
-
E.
Morgan County
Morgan County is a county in central Indiana, United States, that forms part of the greater Indianapolis metropolitan region.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69ca838a424c8190b1ecac115c2927e7 |
completed | March 30, 2026, 2:07 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69cc60abb0748190af41d4e1f419e39c |
completed | April 1, 2026, 12:02 a.m. |
| NED1 | Entity disambiguation (via context triple) | batch_69d09b3a8a248190aa32981bdcbe570d |
completed | April 4, 2026, 5:01 a.m. |
Created at: March 30, 2026, 6:49 p.m.