Triple
T8833777
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | International Court of Justice ruling of 2009 |
E210210
|
entity |
| Predicate | applicationFiled |
P30230
|
FINISHED |
| Object | 2004 |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: 2004 | Statement: [International Court of Justice ruling of 2009, applicationFiled, 2004]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: applicationFiled Context triple: [International Court of Justice ruling of 2009, applicationFiled, 2004]
-
A.
inventionApplication
Indicates that an entity has submitted or is associated with an application for an invention, typically for legal or patent-related purposes.
-
B.
appliedFor
Indicates that an entity has submitted a request or application to another entity for a position, service, benefit, or opportunity.
-
C.
filedWith
chosen
Indicates that one entity has officially submitted or registered something (such as a document, complaint, or application) to another entity or authority.
-
D.
applicationProcessedBy
Indicates that an application has been handled or dealt with by a particular agent or system.
-
E.
filingForm
Indicates that an entity submits or completes a specific form or document, typically as part of an official or administrative process.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69ca8388549c819095fd94eadefbb007 |
completed | March 30, 2026, 2:07 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69cc60670fa48190b2a873f6498de7f6 |
completed | April 1, 2026, 12:01 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69cc5c23d08481908d8c9b0ad3d1dc00 |
completed | March 31, 2026, 11:43 p.m. |
Created at: March 30, 2026, 6:47 p.m.