Triple
T8832109
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | antiprotonic helium |
E210169
|
entity |
| Predicate | annihilationChannel |
P49010
|
FINISHED |
| Object | antiproton–nucleon annihilation in the helium nucleus |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: antiproton–nucleon annihilation in the helium nucleus | Statement: [antiprotonic helium, annihilationChannel, antiproton–nucleon annihilation in the helium nucleus]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: annihilationChannel Context triple: [antiprotonic helium, annihilationChannel, antiproton–nucleon annihilation in the helium nucleus]
-
A.
ownedChannel
Indicates that one entity possesses ownership or control over a particular channel.
-
B.
deathAnnouncedBy
Indicates that the occurrence of a death is publicly communicated or formally reported by a specific agent or source.
-
C.
typeOfDestruction
chosen
Indicates the specific manner or method by which something is destroyed or caused to cease to exist.
-
D.
redemptionChannel
Indicates the method, medium, or route through which a benefit, reward, or entitlement can be redeemed or claimed.
-
E.
sisterChannel
Indicates that one channel is a sibling or counterpart to another channel, typically under the same ownership or network.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69ca8365b28081909e48e45e95dfc405 |
completed | March 30, 2026, 2:06 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69cc605005788190a4df1fe317f3056a |
completed | April 1, 2026, 12:01 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69cc5c23d08481908d8c9b0ad3d1dc00 |
completed | March 31, 2026, 11:43 p.m. |
Created at: March 30, 2026, 6:47 p.m.