Triple

T8831135
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Goldberger E210144 entity
Predicate isFoundInContext P34621 FINISHED
Object professional contexts LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: professional contexts | Statement: [Goldberger, isFoundInContext, professional contexts]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: isFoundInContext
Context triple: [Goldberger, isFoundInContext, professional contexts]
  • A. isRaisedInContextOf
    Indicates that an entity is brought up, discussed, or introduced within a particular situational, thematic, or conversational context.
  • B. namedInContextOf chosen
    Indicates that an entity is mentioned or identified specifically within a particular context, situation, or frame of reference.
  • C. emergedInContext
    Indicates that something came into existence, became apparent, or developed within a specific situation, environment, or set of circumstances.
  • D. existsWithin
    Indicates that one entity is located inside the spatial, temporal, or conceptual boundaries of another entity.
  • E. areDefinedIn
    Indicates that the referenced entities are specified, described, or formally established within a particular source, context, or scope.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69ca8365b28081909e48e45e95dfc405 completed March 30, 2026, 2:06 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69cc604ed2b88190b4f53b34b5a438f7 completed April 1, 2026, 12:01 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69cc5c23d08481908d8c9b0ad3d1dc00 completed March 31, 2026, 11:43 p.m.
Created at: March 30, 2026, 6:47 p.m.