Triple
T8827491
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Guy de Vere |
E210051
|
entity |
| Predicate | fictionalMediumOfAppearance |
P16443
|
FINISHED |
| Object | lyric poem |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: lyric poem | Statement: [Guy de Vere, fictionalMediumOfAppearance, lyric poem]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: fictionalMediumOfAppearance Context triple: [Guy de Vere, fictionalMediumOfAppearance, lyric poem]
-
A.
fictionalMedium
chosen
Indicates that a work of fiction is presented or conveyed through a particular medium or format (such as a book, film, game, or comic).
-
B.
fictionalOrigin
Indicates that one entity originates from, or was first introduced within, a fictional work, universe, or narrative created by another entity.
-
C.
hasFictionComponent
Indicates that something includes, contains, or is composed in part of a fictional element or work.
-
D.
fictionalMaterial
Indicates that something is made of, composed of, or incorporates a material that exists only in fiction or imagination.
-
E.
fictionalGenre
Indicates that a work of fiction belongs to or is categorized under a particular narrative genre or style.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69ca8365b28081909e48e45e95dfc405 |
completed | March 30, 2026, 2:06 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69cc604ac0288190b59344bced8ac733 |
completed | April 1, 2026, 12:01 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69cc5c23d08481908d8c9b0ad3d1dc00 |
completed | March 31, 2026, 11:43 p.m. |
Created at: March 30, 2026, 6:47 p.m.