Triple
T8821543
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Carolyn B. McHugh |
E209914
|
entity |
| Predicate | appointedToCourt |
P71782
|
FINISHED |
| Object | United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit |
E15927
|
NE FINISHED |
How this triple was built (3 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit | Statement: [Carolyn B. McHugh, appointedToCourt, United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit Context triple: [Carolyn B. McHugh, appointedToCourt, United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit]
-
A.
United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
chosen
The United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit is a federal appellate court that reviews cases from district courts in six western and central states, including Colorado, Kansas, New Mexico, Oklahoma, Utah, and Wyoming.
-
B.
United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
The United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit is a federal appellate court that reviews cases from district courts in several Midwestern states, including Arkansas, Iowa, Minnesota, Missouri, Nebraska, North Dakota, and South Dakota.
-
C.
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
The United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit is a federal appellate court that reviews cases from district courts in a large western region of the United States, including states such as California, Arizona, and Washington.
-
D.
United States District of Kansas
The United States District of Kansas is a federal trial court within the U.S. judiciary that handles civil and criminal cases arising under federal law in the state of Kansas.
-
E.
United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
The United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit is a federal appellate court that reviews cases from district courts in Illinois, Indiana, and Wisconsin.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: appointedToCourt Context triple: [Carolyn B. McHugh, appointedToCourt, United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit]
-
A.
appointedWith
Indicates that one entity has been formally assigned or designated to a role, position, or responsibility in relation to another entity.
-
B.
appointedToCourtOfFederalClaimsBy
Indicates that one entity formally selected and installed another entity as a judge on the United States Court of Federal Claims.
-
C.
appointedIn
chosen
Indicates that an entity is formally assigned or designated to a role, position, or office within a specific context, organization, or jurisdiction.
-
D.
appointedFor
Indicates that an entity has been officially assigned or designated to perform a specific role, task, or function for another entity or purpose.
-
E.
appointedAs
Indicates that one entity is formally assigned or designated to hold a specific role, position, or title in relation to another entity.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69ca8364e13081909c85fe80f44fe86f |
completed | March 30, 2026, 2:06 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69cc601126248190b6f10c22f1aeac9a |
completed | April 1, 2026, midnight |
| NED1 | Entity disambiguation (via context triple) | batch_69cfa05742948190bcec72a080f6837a |
completed | April 3, 2026, 11:11 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69cc5c21e64c81908490e3b0875dc0d6 |
completed | March 31, 2026, 11:43 p.m. |
Created at: March 30, 2026, 6:46 p.m.