Triple

T8821464
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Michael Baca E209912 entity
Predicate subjectOfCourtCase P17092 FINISHED
Object Colorado Department of State v. Baca E41904 NE FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Colorado Department of State v. Baca | Statement: [Michael Baca, subjectOfCourtCase, Colorado Department of State v. Baca]
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07 
Target entity: Colorado Department of State v. Baca
Context triple: [Michael Baca, subjectOfCourtCase, Colorado Department of State v. Baca]
  • A. Colorado Department of State v. Baca chosen
    Colorado Department of State v. Baca is a U.S. federal court case addressing whether states can remove or sanction presidential electors who refuse to vote in accordance with their state's popular vote in the Electoral College.
  • B. Lucas v. Forty-Fourth General Assembly of Colorado
    Lucas v. Forty-Fourth General Assembly of Colorado is a 1964 U.S. Supreme Court case that applied the "one person, one vote" principle to invalidate a Colorado legislative apportionment scheme that had been approved by popular referendum.
  • C. Hill v. Colorado
    Hill v. Colorado is a 2000 U.S. Supreme Court decision that upheld a state law creating buffer zones around individuals entering healthcare facilities, significantly shaping First Amendment jurisprudence on protest and speech restrictions near abortion clinics.
  • D. Arizona v. Johnson
    Arizona v. Johnson is a 2009 U.S. Supreme Court case that clarified police authority to frisk passengers during lawful traffic stops when officers reasonably suspect they are armed and dangerous.
  • E. Brnovich v. Democratic National Committee
    Brnovich v. Democratic National Committee is a 2021 U.S. Supreme Court decision that significantly narrowed the scope of federal protections against voting discrimination, particularly under Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act.
  • F. None of above.
  • G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69ca8364e13081909c85fe80f44fe86f completed March 30, 2026, 2:06 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69cc601126248190b6f10c22f1aeac9a completed April 1, 2026, midnight
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) batch_69cf6fd064208190b1c8e1e1848763d2 completed April 3, 2026, 7:44 a.m.
Created at: March 30, 2026, 6:46 p.m.