Triple

T8816479
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Santos Dumont Airport E209788 entity
Predicate hasScenicApproach P9193 FINISHED
Object views of Rio de Janeiro landmarks LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: views of Rio de Janeiro landmarks | Statement: [Santos Dumont Airport, hasScenicApproach, views of Rio de Janeiro landmarks]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasScenicApproach
Context triple: [Santos Dumont Airport, hasScenicApproach, views of Rio de Janeiro landmarks]
  • A. hasScenicDrive
    Indicates that one entity offers or features a visually appealing or picturesque driving route associated with it.
  • B. hasScenicSections
    Indicates that a route, path, or area contains segments that are visually attractive or offer notable scenic views.
  • C. hasScenicViewOf chosen
    Indicates that one entity offers a visually appealing or picturesque view of another entity.
  • D. hasScenicValue
    Indicates that something possesses notable aesthetic or visual appeal, often due to its natural beauty or pleasing surroundings.
  • E. isPartOfScenicVista
    Indicates that something is included within, or contributes to, a larger scenic vista or panoramic view.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69ca8364e13081909c85fe80f44fe86f completed March 30, 2026, 2:06 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69cc600bd8a88190ad891a96201d796b completed April 1, 2026, midnight
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69cc5c21e64c81908490e3b0875dc0d6 completed March 31, 2026, 11:43 p.m.
Created at: March 30, 2026, 6:46 p.m.