Triple

T881418
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Oliver Wendell Holmes Jr. E19033 entity
Predicate notableWork P4 FINISHED
Object Schenck v. United States opinion E32820 NE FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Schenck v. United States opinion | Statement: [Oliver Wendell Holmes Jr., notableWork, Schenck v. United States opinion]
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Schenck v. United States opinion
Context triple: [Oliver Wendell Holmes Jr., notableWork, Schenck v. United States opinion]
  • A. Schenck v. United States chosen
    Schenck v. United States is a 1919 U.S. Supreme Court case that established the “clear and present danger” test, allowing the government to restrict speech during wartime.
  • B. Debs v. United States
    Debs v. United States was a 1919 U.S. Supreme Court case in which socialist leader Eugene V. Debs’s conviction for antiwar speech was upheld, reinforcing broad limits on free speech during wartime.
  • C. Gitlow v. New York
    Gitlow v. New York is a 1925 U.S. Supreme Court case that marked a major step in applying First Amendment free speech protections to the states through the Fourteenth Amendment.
  • D. Printz v. United States
    Printz v. United States is a 1997 U.S. Supreme Court decision that limited federal power by holding that Congress cannot compel state or local officials to implement federal regulatory programs.
  • E. Brandenburg v. Ohio
    Brandenburg v. Ohio is a 1969 U.S. Supreme Court decision that significantly strengthened free speech protections by establishing the "imminent lawless action" test for when advocacy of violence can be punished under the First Amendment.
  • F. None of above.
  • G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69a4939c32488190a7ccd41cf0abb22b completed March 1, 2026, 7:29 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69a4accb653c81909fe0753f78145be9 completed March 1, 2026, 9:16 p.m.
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) batch_69a7b85883c481909261bde7fdebcde1 completed March 4, 2026, 4:43 a.m.
Created at: March 1, 2026, 7:39 p.m.