Triple

Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).

Phrase: "Clear and present danger" doctrine | Statement: [Oliver Wendell Holmes Jr., notableWork, "Clear and present danger" doctrine]

Target entity: "Clear and present danger" doctrine
Context triple: [Oliver Wendell Holmes Jr., notableWork, "Clear and present danger" doctrine]

• A. Schenck v. United States chosen
  Schenck v. United States is a 1919 U.S. Supreme Court case that established the “clear and present danger” test, allowing the government to restrict speech during wartime.
• B. Smith Act
  The Smith Act is a 1940 U.S. federal law that criminalized advocating the violent overthrow of the government and was widely used during the early Cold War to prosecute suspected communists.
• C. Brandenburg v. Ohio
  Brandenburg v. Ohio is a 1969 U.S. Supreme Court decision that significantly strengthened free speech protections by establishing the "imminent lawless action" test for when advocacy of violence can be punished under the First Amendment.
• D. FCC v. Pacifica Foundation
  FCC v. Pacifica Foundation is a landmark 1978 U.S. Supreme Court case that upheld the government's authority to regulate indecent material on public airwaves, stemming from a radio broadcast of George Carlin's "Seven Dirty Words" monologue.
• E. Gitlow v. New York
  Gitlow v. New York is a 1925 U.S. Supreme Court case that marked a major step in applying First Amendment free speech protections to the states through the Fourteenth Amendment.
• F. None of above.
• G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.