Triple

T8813936
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Impromptus, D. 899 E209730 entity
Predicate hasOpusGrouping P74342 FINISHED
Object group of four impromptus LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: group of four impromptus | Statement: [Impromptus, D. 899, hasOpusGrouping, group of four impromptus]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasOpusGrouping
Context triple: [Impromptus, D. 899, hasOpusGrouping, group of four impromptus]
  • A. ISOGroupingStatus
    Indicates the relationship between an entity and its classification or status within an ISO-defined grouping or category.
  • B. hasCoveringGroup
    Indicates that one group serves as a covering group (typically a covering or universal covering in the group-theoretic sense) for another group.
  • C. hasStationGroup
    Indicates that an entity is associated with, or belongs to, a particular group or collection of stations.
  • D. groupedInto chosen
    Indicates that multiple entities are collected or organized together as members of a common group or category.
  • E. hasSubfieldGroup
    Indicates that an entity includes or is associated with a specific subgroup of related subfields within its overall structure or domain.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69ca8363f3308190a47e3f1ebd51f613 completed March 30, 2026, 2:06 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69cc5ff1a4448190b5559f440d264442 completed March 31, 2026, 11:59 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69cc5c1f28ec8190a34311cb412920c2 completed March 31, 2026, 11:43 p.m.
Created at: March 30, 2026, 6:45 p.m.