Triple
T8789289
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Openbox |
E209119
|
entity |
| Predicate | isExtensibleWith |
P17547
|
FINISHED |
| Object | external tools and scripts |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: external tools and scripts | Statement: [Openbox, isExtensibleWith, external tools and scripts]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: isExtensibleWith Context triple: [Openbox, isExtensibleWith, external tools and scripts]
-
A.
canBeAugmentedWith
chosen
Indicates that one entity is capable of being enhanced, expanded, or supplemented by another entity.
-
B.
extendsTo
Indicates that one entity reaches, stretches, or continues its scope, influence, or coverage up to or into another entity.
-
C.
mayExtendTo
Indicates that something has the potential or permission to reach, continue, or be applied up to a specified limit, scope, or boundary.
-
D.
definesExtension
Indicates that one entity specifies or establishes the extension, scope, or detailed form of another entity.
-
E.
isExtendedVersionOf
Indicates that one entity is a longer or more developed form of another, typically adding content or features while preserving the original’s core.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69ca836168108190bb43d3dc235c1f55 |
completed | March 30, 2026, 2:06 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69cc5f8b0c108190af53d4bb9b132c5c |
completed | March 31, 2026, 11:58 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69cc5c1d48f08190b325a77d4c76d223 |
completed | March 31, 2026, 11:43 p.m. |
Created at: March 30, 2026, 6:43 p.m.