Triple
T8785150
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | King of Calypso |
E209025
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasProfessionOfReferent |
P35550
|
FINISHED |
| Object | singer |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: singer | Statement: [King of Calypso, hasProfessionOfReferent, singer]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasProfessionOfReferent Context triple: [King of Calypso, hasProfessionOfReferent, singer]
-
A.
isAssociatedWithProfessionOfBearer
Indicates that one entity is connected to, or involved with, the profession or occupational role held by another entity.
-
B.
memberProfession
chosen
Indicates that a member or individual holds or practices a particular profession or occupation.
-
C.
includesProfession
Indicates that one entity’s set of attributes, roles, or members contains a specific profession as part of it.
-
D.
recognizesProfession
Indicates that one entity acknowledges or identifies another entity’s professional role or occupation as such.
-
E.
hasNotableProfessionField
Indicates that an entity’s notable profession or occupation belongs to a particular professional field or domain.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69ca836168108190bb43d3dc235c1f55 |
completed | March 30, 2026, 2:06 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69cc5f758d348190804942d985f2337c |
completed | March 31, 2026, 11:57 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69cc5c1aff3881908be6a9cbc9f50461 |
completed | March 31, 2026, 11:43 p.m. |
Created at: March 30, 2026, 6:42 p.m.