Triple
T8768898
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Zanian languages |
E208405
|
entity |
| Predicate | typologicalCategory |
P5201
|
FINISHED |
| Object | head-marking languages |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: head-marking languages | Statement: [Zanian languages, typologicalCategory, head-marking languages]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: typologicalCategory Context triple: [Zanian languages, typologicalCategory, head-marking languages]
-
A.
typology
Indicates a classification relationship in which entities are grouped or organized according to shared types, patterns, or structural characteristics.
-
B.
linguisticType
Indicates the type or category of language or linguistic system associated with an entity (e.g., spoken, signed, written, or other linguistic modality).
-
C.
hasLinguisticTypology
chosen
Indicates a relationship where a language or linguistic system is characterized by a specific typological classification or structural type.
-
D.
glottoCategory
Indicates the linguistic classification or type (such as language family, subgroup, or category) to which a language or dialect is assigned.
-
E.
linguisticClassification
Indicates the relationship by which an entity is categorized according to its language or linguistic type.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69ca835edb4481909b4aafb616dc5eb7 |
completed | March 30, 2026, 2:06 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69cc5eec49708190ba760d81a7974c50 |
completed | March 31, 2026, 11:55 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69cc5c1884bc8190a46e8308db31f7ab |
completed | March 31, 2026, 11:43 p.m. |
Created at: March 30, 2026, 6:41 p.m.