Triple
T8755806
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | YANG actions |
E208069
|
entity |
| Predicate | canBeDefinedUnder |
P78663
|
FINISHED |
| Object | container nodes |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: container nodes | Statement: [YANG actions, canBeDefinedUnder, container nodes]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: canBeDefinedUnder Context triple: [YANG actions, canBeDefinedUnder, container nodes]
-
A.
areDefinedIn
Indicates that the referenced entities are specified, described, or formally established within a particular source, context, or scope.
-
B.
mayDefine
chosen
Indicates that one entity has the authority or capability to specify, establish, or determine the form, content, or rules of another entity.
-
C.
canBe
Indicates that one entity has the potential, permission, or capability to become, perform as, or be classified as another entity.
-
D.
canBeDeployedUnder
Indicates that one entity is permitted or suitable to be deployed or operated under the conditions, context, or authority defined by another entity.
-
E.
canBeDesignatedBy
Indicates that one entity is capable of being assigned, labeled, or identified by another entity as its designation.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69ca835cd6b08190bd7c63db92f53c86 |
completed | March 30, 2026, 2:06 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69cc5dd95e9481909cc88e8d91601754 |
completed | March 31, 2026, 11:50 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69cc5c160dac8190b4aeb4bf0529de52 |
completed | March 31, 2026, 11:43 p.m. |
Created at: March 30, 2026, 6:39 p.m.