Triple
T8755504
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | PDQ |
E208062
|
entity |
| Predicate | supportsExactMatch |
P85206
|
FINISHED |
| Object | true |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: true | Statement: [PDQ, supportsExactMatch, true]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: supportsExactMatch Context triple: [PDQ, supportsExactMatch, true]
-
A.
supportsPartialMatch
Indicates that the relationship or operation allows matching based on a subset or portion of the target criteria rather than requiring a complete or exact match.
-
B.
includesMatch
Indicates that one entity contains or encompasses a particular match or matching instance of another entity.
-
C.
requiresMatchFrom
Indicates that one entity’s validity or operation depends on finding a corresponding matching entity according to specified criteria.
-
D.
usesMatchesFrom
Indicates that one entity relies on or incorporates matches (e.g., pattern matches, rule matches, or result matches) produced by another entity or process.
-
E.
typicalMatchType
Indicates the usual or most common type of match or pairing that characterizes how two entities are related or aligned.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69ca835cd6b08190bd7c63db92f53c86 |
completed | March 30, 2026, 2:06 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69cc5dd95e9481909cc88e8d91601754 |
completed | March 31, 2026, 11:50 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69cc5c160dac8190b4aeb4bf0529de52 |
completed | March 31, 2026, 11:43 p.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69cc5cfddef48190aee764ee7b25bae9 |
completed | March 31, 2026, 11:47 p.m. |
Created at: March 30, 2026, 6:39 p.m.