Triple

T8753223
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Janus v. AFSCME E208010 entity
Predicate affectedAreaOfLaw P2167 FINISHED
Object public-sector labor law LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: public-sector labor law | Statement: [Janus v. AFSCME, affectedAreaOfLaw, public-sector labor law]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: affectedAreaOfLaw
Context triple: [Janus v. AFSCME, affectedAreaOfLaw, public-sector labor law]
  • A. notableAreaOfLaw
    Indicates that a person or entity is particularly recognized or distinguished in a specific field or area of law.
  • B. legalArea chosen
    Indicates the specific field or branch of law that a legal matter, case, or document pertains to.
  • C. affectedJurisdictionOver
    Indicates that one entity’s authority, control, or legal power extends over and impacts the jurisdiction of another entity.
  • D. branchOfLaw
    Indicates a relationship where one legal field or discipline is a subdivision or specialized area within a broader body of law.
  • E. legalMatters
    Indicates that one entity is involved with, concerned about, or responsible for legal issues, processes, or obligations related to another entity or context.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69ca835cd6b08190bd7c63db92f53c86 completed March 30, 2026, 2:06 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69cc5dd714dc8190bccc4d52f988958d completed March 31, 2026, 11:50 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69cc5c160dac8190b4aeb4bf0529de52 completed March 31, 2026, 11:43 p.m.
Created at: March 30, 2026, 6:39 p.m.