Triple
T8753195
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Janus v. AFSCME |
E208010
|
entity |
| Predicate | fullName |
P16
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Janus v. American Federation of State, County, and Municipal Employees, Council 31 |
E208010
|
NE FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Janus v. American Federation of State, County, and Municipal Employees, Council 31 | Statement: [Janus v. AFSCME, fullName, Janus v. American Federation of State, County, and Municipal Employees, Council 31]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Janus v. American Federation of State, County, and Municipal Employees, Council 31 Context triple: [Janus v. AFSCME, fullName, Janus v. American Federation of State, County, and Municipal Employees, Council 31]
-
A.
Janus v. AFSCME
chosen
Janus v. AFSCME is a landmark 2018 U.S. Supreme Court decision that held public-sector unions cannot require nonmembers to pay agency fees, significantly weakening union funding and power.
-
B.
Hague v. CIO
Hague v. CIO is a 1939 U.S. Supreme Court case that significantly shaped First Amendment jurisprudence by affirming protections for public assembly and speech in public forums.
-
C.
Wards Cove Packing Co. v. Atonio
Wards Cove Packing Co. v. Atonio is a 1989 U.S. Supreme Court case that narrowed the standards for proving employment discrimination under Title VII, prompting Congress to later revise those standards in the Civil Rights Act of 1991.
-
D.
United Public Workers v. Mitchell
United Public Workers v. Mitchell is a 1947 U.S. Supreme Court case that upheld the constitutionality of the Hatch Act’s restrictions on federal employees’ political activities.
-
E.
Bolling v. Sharpe
Bolling v. Sharpe is a 1954 U.S. Supreme Court case that held racial segregation in Washington, D.C. public schools unconstitutional under the Fifth Amendment’s Due Process Clause.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69ca835cd6b08190bd7c63db92f53c86 |
completed | March 30, 2026, 2:06 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69cc5dd714dc8190bccc4d52f988958d |
completed | March 31, 2026, 11:50 p.m. |
| NED1 | Entity disambiguation (via context triple) | batch_69cf4326d8cc8190900f5f91da6ef6c8 |
completed | April 3, 2026, 4:33 a.m. |
Created at: March 30, 2026, 6:39 p.m.