Triple
T8750765
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Central Iowa |
E207951
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasCity |
P316
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Monroe, Iowa |
E413847
|
NE FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Monroe, Iowa | Statement: [Central Iowa, hasCity, Monroe, Iowa]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Monroe, Iowa Context triple: [Central Iowa, hasCity, Monroe, Iowa]
-
A.
City of Monroe, Iowa
chosen
The City of Monroe, Iowa, is a small rural community in central Iowa known for its close-knit atmosphere and agricultural surroundings.
-
B.
Washington, Iowa
Washington, Iowa is a small city in southeastern Iowa known for its historic downtown, agricultural surroundings, and role as a local commercial and cultural hub.
-
C.
Hancock, Iowa
Hancock, Iowa is a small rural city located in western Iowa within Pottawattamie County.
-
D.
Montpelier, Iowa
Montpelier, Iowa is a small unincorporated community located along the Mississippi River in eastern Iowa.
-
E.
Mineola, Iowa
Mineola, Iowa is a small unincorporated rural community located in southwestern Iowa.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69ca835bb2bc819084bb5906cb6ef7f8 |
completed | March 30, 2026, 2:06 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69cc5da774f4819099e5bfd12973d946 |
completed | March 31, 2026, 11:49 p.m. |
| NED1 | Entity disambiguation (via context triple) | batch_69cf431db5a88190a579b43370a8e887 |
completed | April 3, 2026, 4:33 a.m. |
Created at: March 30, 2026, 6:39 p.m.