Triple

T8726260
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Carduelinae E207137 entity
Predicate notableFeedingBehavior P84287 FINISHED
Object gregarious at feeding sites LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: gregarious at feeding sites | Statement: [Carduelinae, notableFeedingBehavior, gregarious at feeding sites]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: notableFeedingBehavior
Context triple: [Carduelinae, notableFeedingBehavior, gregarious at feeding sites]
  • A. feedingHabitat
    Indicates the type of environment or location where an organism typically obtains and consumes its food.
  • B. feedingStructure
    Indicates a relationship where one entity serves as the anatomical or mechanical structure used by another entity to obtain or ingest food.
  • C. feedingSpecialization
    Indicates a relationship where an entity is specialized or adapted to feed on a particular type or range of food resources.
  • D. gnawingBehavior
    Indicates a relationship where an entity persistently chews or bites another entity, typically causing gradual wear or damage.
  • E. feederFoodPreference
    Indicates the type of food that is preferred or typically used in a particular feeder.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69ca835811d8819081ea00fd2a2c9a1c completed March 30, 2026, 2:06 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69cc5d158b0481908249610458f97306 completed March 31, 2026, 11:47 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69cc457093188190959287a6458651c6 completed March 31, 2026, 10:06 p.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69cc489dd528819084ed5d88bd8bb3d6 completed March 31, 2026, 10:20 p.m.
Created at: March 30, 2026, 6:36 p.m.