Triple

T8709053
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Stuart Ullman E206725 entity
Predicate hasRelationshipToOverlookHotel P84664 FINISHED
Object administrator LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: administrator | Statement: [Stuart Ullman, hasRelationshipToOverlookHotel, administrator]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasRelationshipToOverlookHotel
Context triple: [Stuart Ullman, hasRelationshipToOverlookHotel, administrator]
  • A. hasResortHotel
    Indicates that one entity owns, includes, or is associated with a resort hotel as part of its facilities or offerings.
  • B. hasPartnerHotel
    Indicates that one hotel has an established partnership or affiliation relationship with another hotel.
  • C. isResortOf
    Indicates that a location or facility functions as a resort associated with, belonging to, or serving a particular entity (such as a city, region, or organization).
  • D. hasAccommodation
    Indicates that an entity provides, owns, or is associated with a place for someone to stay or live.
  • E. hasSisterResort
    Indicates that one resort is formally associated with another as its sister property, typically under common ownership or branding.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69ca835645e881908f00e3c8b51da81d completed March 30, 2026, 2:06 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69cc5c2e9c688190aceefaa2c3b7d7bd completed March 31, 2026, 11:43 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69cc456bda508190a9aa0fb92760739e completed March 31, 2026, 10:06 p.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69cc582412f48190ae819965bfb0e75d completed March 31, 2026, 11:26 p.m.
Created at: March 30, 2026, 6:35 p.m.