Triple
T8697123
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | RFC 7540 |
E206428
|
entity |
| Predicate | securityConsiderationsDocumentedIn |
P25437
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Section 10 |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Section 10 | Statement: [RFC 7540, securityConsiderationsDocumentedIn, Section 10]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: securityConsiderationsDocumentedIn Context triple: [RFC 7540, securityConsiderationsDocumentedIn, Section 10]
-
A.
securityAdvisory
Indicates a relationship where an entity issues, references, or is associated with a warning or guidance about security vulnerabilities, risks, or protective measures.
-
B.
securityGuarantee
Indicates a commitment by one party to protect or defend another party against specified threats or risks.
-
C.
securityRecommendation
Indicates that one entity advises or prescribes specific security-related actions, settings, or measures for another entity.
-
D.
hasSecurityConsideration
chosen
Indicates that there is a relevant security-related issue, risk, or precaution associated with the referenced entity.
-
E.
securityAspect
Indicates a relationship where something pertains to, represents, or characterizes a particular aspect or dimension of security.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69ca83555b6c8190abe930dd397e863b |
completed | March 30, 2026, 2:06 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69cc582b04688190a439135b08e20451 |
completed | March 31, 2026, 11:26 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69cc456bda508190a9aa0fb92760739e |
completed | March 31, 2026, 10:06 p.m. |
Created at: March 30, 2026, 6:34 p.m.