Triple
T869469
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Titans |
E18777
|
entity |
| Predicate | languageOfMyth |
P6149
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Ancient Greek |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Ancient Greek | Statement: [Titans, languageOfMyth, Ancient Greek]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: languageOfMyth Context triple: [Titans, languageOfMyth, Ancient Greek]
-
A.
linkedToMythology
Indicates that something has a connection or association with a mythological tradition, figure, story, or theme.
-
B.
mythologicalRole
Indicates the specific function, duty, or status an entity holds within a mythological or legendary context.
-
C.
mythologicalEvent
Indicates an event or occurrence that takes place within mythological narratives or traditions, often involving gods, heroes, or supernatural phenomena.
-
D.
equivalentInRomanMythology
Indicates that one entity corresponds to or is identified as the Roman-mythology counterpart of another entity from a different mythological tradition.
-
E.
heritageLanguage
chosen
Indicates that one entity is the ancestral or culturally inherited language associated with another entity.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69a4938ce8688190a24bdfef82ba7d21 |
completed | March 1, 2026, 7:29 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69a4ac811e548190a72b7a10b5ea8665 |
completed | March 1, 2026, 9:15 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69a4aa89ca008190b50d061ac7fe19f9 |
completed | March 1, 2026, 9:07 p.m. |
Created at: March 1, 2026, 7:39 p.m.