Triple

T868719
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject ISO 21500 E18762 entity
Predicate notIntendedAs P7974 FINISHED
Object detailed project management methodology LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: detailed project management methodology | Statement: [ISO 21500, notIntendedAs, detailed project management methodology]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: notIntendedAs
Context triple: [ISO 21500, notIntendedAs, detailed project management methodology]
  • A. notRecommendedBy
    Indicates that one entity explicitly advises against or does not endorse another entity.
  • B. notRecognizedBy
    Indicates that one entity does not acknowledge, accept, or formally recognize the status, authority, or validity of another entity.
  • C. notTypicallyUsedFor chosen
    Indicates that something is generally not used for a particular purpose, function, or activity under normal circumstances.
  • D. notFunction
    Indicates that the specified entity does not serve as a function or is not used in a functional role within the given context.
  • E. doesNot
    Indicates that a specified entity lacks, refrains from, or fails to perform a particular action or exhibit a particular property in relation to another entity or context.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69a4938ce8688190a24bdfef82ba7d21 completed March 1, 2026, 7:29 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69a4ac7f98908190883f71049092c7c8 completed March 1, 2026, 9:15 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69a4aa87504481909618a6815948da6f completed March 1, 2026, 9:07 p.m.
Created at: March 1, 2026, 7:39 p.m.