Triple

T867782
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject IN-DL E18743 entity
Predicate codeFormatExample P12958 FINISHED
Object IN-DL LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: IN-DL | Statement: [IN-DL, codeFormatExample, IN-DL]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: codeFormatExample
Context triple: [IN-DL, codeFormatExample, IN-DL]
  • A. codeStandard
    Indicates that an entity adheres to, complies with, or is governed by a specified coding or programming standard.
  • B. format
    Indicates the specific arrangement, structure, or presentation style in which something is organized or expressed.
  • C. formatDSTExample chosen
    Indicates that an example is provided to illustrate how something should be formatted in a dialog state tracking (DST) context.
  • D. codeFor
    Indicates that one entity serves as the implementation, encoding, or programmatic representation for another entity.
  • E. hasExample
    Indicates that one entity serves as an instance, illustration, or concrete example of another entity.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69a4938ce8688190a24bdfef82ba7d21 completed March 1, 2026, 7:29 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69a4ac7e12b0819084d25b9a66888a91 completed March 1, 2026, 9:15 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69a4aa87504481909618a6815948da6f completed March 1, 2026, 9:07 p.m.
Created at: March 1, 2026, 7:39 p.m.