Triple

T8673760
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject VORB E205862 entity
Predicate underlyingCompanyStatus P84409 FINISHED
Object bankrupt LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: bankrupt | Statement: [VORB, underlyingCompanyStatus, bankrupt]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: underlyingCompanyStatus
Context triple: [VORB, underlyingCompanyStatus, bankrupt]
  • A. underlyingCompany
    Indicates that one entity serves as the fundamental or base company upon which another entity (such as a product, instrument, or structure) is built, derived, or dependent.
  • B. underlyingCompanyType
    Indicates the classification or category of company that forms the basis or source for another related entity or instrument.
  • C. underlyingCompanyMarketPosition
    Indicates the competitive standing or strength of a company within its relevant market or industry.
  • D. underlyingCompanyName
    Indicates the name of the company that serves as the foundational or primary entity underlying another entity, structure, or instrument.
  • E. hasUnderlyingCompanyLegalForm
    Indicates that an entity is associated with, or governed by, a specific underlying legal form of a company.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69ca83529a9c8190b5c075b4f14636ed completed March 30, 2026, 2:06 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69cc4ae6d19c8190be003f7901c0468d completed March 31, 2026, 10:29 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69cc4567b5c881908d9ec5dcfc783fac completed March 31, 2026, 10:06 p.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69cc4ae517108190a71a86349815f4ce completed March 31, 2026, 10:29 p.m.
Created at: March 30, 2026, 6:31 p.m.