Triple
T8672362
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | RFC 2617 |
E205827
|
entity |
| Predicate | obsoletedBy |
P101
|
FINISHED |
| Object | RFC 7235 |
E41246
|
NE FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: RFC 7235 | Statement: [RFC 2617, obsoletedBy, RFC 7235]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: RFC 7235 Context triple: [RFC 2617, obsoletedBy, RFC 7235]
-
A.
RFC 7235
chosen
RFC 7235 is an IETF specification that defined the HTTP/1.1 authentication framework, including the use of challenge-response mechanisms like Basic and Digest authentication.
-
B.
RFC 7234
RFC 7234 is an IETF specification that defines HTTP/1.1 caching semantics, including how responses may be stored, reused, and validated by caches.
-
C.
RFC 7232
RFC 7232 is an HTTP/1.1 specification that defines conditional request mechanisms using validators like ETags and Last-Modified to support efficient caching and concurrency control on the web.
-
D.
RFC 7230
RFC 7230 is an IETF standard that specifies the core message syntax and routing semantics for the Hypertext Transfer Protocol (HTTP/1.1), including its use over secure transport like HTTPS.
-
E.
RFC 7233
RFC 7233 was an HTTP/1.1 specification that defined range requests and partial content delivery mechanisms for HTTP resources.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69ca83529a9c8190b5c075b4f14636ed |
completed | March 30, 2026, 2:06 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69cc491a34d08190b0795079d192a03d |
completed | March 31, 2026, 10:22 p.m. |
| NED1 | Entity disambiguation (via context triple) | batch_69cf286a364c8190b7f4f9d8243e2548 |
completed | April 3, 2026, 2:39 a.m. |
Created at: March 30, 2026, 6:31 p.m.