Triple
T8669041
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Sound Transit 3 |
E205748
|
entity |
| Predicate | includesProjectType |
P12865
|
FINISHED |
| Object | light rail extensions |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: light rail extensions | Statement: [Sound Transit 3, includesProjectType, light rail extensions]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: includesProjectType Context triple: [Sound Transit 3, includesProjectType, light rail extensions]
-
A.
hasProjectType
chosen
Indicates that an entity is associated with, or classified under, a specific type or category of project.
-
B.
supportsProjectType
Indicates that one entity is capable of handling, accommodating, or being compatible with a specified type of project.
-
C.
eligibleProjectType
Indicates that a project belongs to a category or type that qualifies it for a specific program, process, or benefit.
-
D.
typicalProjectTypes
Indicates the kinds or categories of projects that are most commonly or characteristically associated with a given entity.
-
E.
includesProviderType
Indicates that one entity’s set of provider types contains or covers the provider type associated with another entity.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69ca83516ae88190aefe034b3bc589e3 |
completed | March 30, 2026, 2:06 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69cc48a48b548190b78259072b1224ee |
completed | March 31, 2026, 10:20 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69cc4564e018819081036722f3e42a71 |
completed | March 31, 2026, 10:06 p.m. |
Created at: March 30, 2026, 6:31 p.m.