Triple
T8651722
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Tebu languages |
E205114
|
entity |
| Predicate | instanceOf |
P0
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Saharan languages |
C6966
|
CONCEPT FINISHED |
How this triple was built (1 step)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
CD
Concept disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target class: Saharan languages Context triple: [Tebu languages, instanceOf, Saharan languages]
-
A.
Chadic language
A Chadic language is any member of a branch of the Afroasiatic language family spoken primarily in parts of Nigeria, Niger, Chad, Cameroon, and neighboring regions, characterized by diverse phonological systems and complex verb morphology.
-
B.
Berber language
Berber language is a branch of the Afroasiatic language family comprising several closely related languages spoken by the indigenous Amazigh peoples of North Africa.
-
C.
Nilo-Saharan language
chosen
A Nilo-Saharan language is a member of a proposed but controversial language family spoken primarily along the Nile and across parts of central and eastern Africa, characterized by significant internal diversity and debated genetic relationships.
-
D.
Northern Berber language
A Northern Berber language is a member of the Berber branch of the Afroasiatic language family spoken primarily across the northern regions of North Africa, characterized by shared phonological, morphological, and syntactic features distinct from other Berber varieties.
-
E.
Amazigh language
The Amazigh language is a group of closely related Afroasiatic languages indigenous to North Africa, spoken by the Amazigh (Berber) people and characterized by rich oral traditions and the Tifinagh script.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (1 batch)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69ca834e56848190abb0eeaec9dedd32 |
completed | March 30, 2026, 2:06 p.m. |
Created at: March 30, 2026, 6:29 p.m.