Triple

T8640827
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Erdős–Rényi model E204641 entity
Predicate connectivityThreshold P84387 FINISHED
Object p ≈ (log n)/n LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: p ≈ (log n)/n | Statement: [Erdős–Rényi model, connectivityThreshold, p ≈ (log n)/n]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: connectivityThreshold
Context triple: [Erdős–Rényi model, connectivityThreshold, p ≈ (log n)/n]
  • A. connectivity
    Indicates...the existence, degree, or quality of a link or communication pathway between entities, allowing interaction or information flow between them.
  • B. connectsWithin
    Indicates that one entity establishes a connection or link between elements that lie inside the bounds or scope of another entity.
  • C. connectivityFeatures
    Indicates the types of network or communication options that are available or supported for connecting to or through an entity.
  • D. connectsState
    Indicates a relationship where one entity serves as a link or conduit between different states, conditions, or statuses of another entity.
  • E. connectsUnder
    Indicates that one entity forms a connection to another entity by passing beneath or under it.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69ca834ca1c88190a11ffb0200342fac completed March 30, 2026, 2:06 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69cc47944d1c819081f448f14d04bf9d completed March 31, 2026, 10:15 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69cc455d6d448190a2da2a319ac78c37 completed March 31, 2026, 10:06 p.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69cc479284a8819099b0b0d879af3372 completed March 31, 2026, 10:15 p.m.
Created at: March 30, 2026, 6:28 p.m.