Triple

T8630257
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Hicks–Kaldor compensation criterion E204382 entity
Predicate alsoKnownAs P39 FINISHED
Object Kaldor–Hicks efficiency criterion E204382 NE FINISHED

Named-entity recognition

Before disambiguation, gpt-5-mini classified whether the object phrase is a named entity — the step behind the object's NE type shown above.

Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Kaldor–Hicks efficiency criterion | Statement: [Hicks–Kaldor compensation criterion, alsoKnownAs, Kaldor–Hicks efficiency criterion]

Disambiguation candidates (1 decision)

The exact options the model was shown at each disambiguation step, with the option it chose highlighted — the evidence behind this triple's disambiguated ids.

NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07 
Target entity: Kaldor–Hicks efficiency criterion
Context triple: [Hicks–Kaldor compensation criterion, alsoKnownAs, Kaldor–Hicks efficiency criterion]
  • A. Hicks–Kaldor compensation criterion chosen
    The Hicks–Kaldor compensation criterion is an economic efficiency test stating that a policy change is desirable if those who gain could in principle compensate those who lose and still be better off, regardless of whether compensation actually occurs.
  • B. Pareto efficiency
    Pareto efficiency is an economic concept describing an allocation of resources where no individual can be made better off without making someone else worse off.
  • C. Pareto improvement
    A Pareto improvement is a change in allocation that makes at least one individual better off without making anyone else worse off.
  • D. second fundamental theorem of welfare economics
    The second fundamental theorem of welfare economics states that, under certain ideal conditions, any Pareto efficient allocation of resources can be achieved as a competitive market equilibrium given an appropriate redistribution of initial endowments.
  • E. Bergson–Samuelson social welfare function
    The Bergson–Samuelson social welfare function is a formal tool in welfare economics that aggregates individual utilities into a single measure of social welfare to evaluate and compare economic states or policies.
  • F. None of above.
  • G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.

Provenance (3 batches)

Stage Batch ID Job type Status
creating batch_69ca834b903c8190add96cc651e1a477 elicitation completed
NER batch_69cc47406efc8190b559c68764b7455d ner completed
NED1 batch_69cebc0acf508190a090fb1edf9420d2 ned_source_triple completed
Created at: March 30, 2026, 6:27 p.m.