Triple
T8610855
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | PBAP |
E203909
|
entity |
| Predicate | typicalServerDevice |
P83871
|
FINISHED |
| Object | mobile phone |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: mobile phone | Statement: [PBAP, typicalServerDevice, mobile phone]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: typicalServerDevice Context triple: [PBAP, typicalServerDevice, mobile phone]
-
A.
typicalServer
Indicates that an entity functions as a standard or representative example of a server within a given context or system.
-
B.
networkDevice
Indicates that one entity functions as a network device that connects, routes, or manages data traffic between other entities in a network.
-
C.
usesServerType
Indicates that an entity operates on, is hosted by, or otherwise relies on a specific type or category of server.
-
D.
typicalMonitor
Indicates that one entity commonly or characteristically monitors, observes, or oversees another entity in a usual or expected manner.
-
E.
connectsDeviceType
Indicates a relationship where one entity is associated with or linked to a specific type or category of device.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69ca832c23e4819095a9f3eea4a21828 |
completed | March 30, 2026, 2:05 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69cc46ee96ac8190809817c403da2889 |
completed | March 31, 2026, 10:13 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69cc455437488190b7506f820daf6e32 |
completed | March 31, 2026, 10:06 p.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69cc46c330bc8190a9b644078881c6ff |
completed | March 31, 2026, 10:12 p.m. |
Created at: March 30, 2026, 6:25 p.m.