Triple

T8603324
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject RFC 1441 E203732 entity
Predicate relatedTo P37 FINISHED
Object RFC 1442 E746618 NE FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: RFC 1442 | Statement: [RFC 1441, relatedTo, RFC 1442]
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07 
Target entity: RFC 1442
Context triple: [RFC 1441, relatedTo, RFC 1442]
  • A. RFC 1442 chosen
    RFC 1442 is an early Internet standards document that defined the Structure of Management Information (SMI) for version 2 of the Simple Network Management Protocol (SNMPv2).
  • B. RFC 1443
    RFC 1443 is an early Internet standards document that specified mechanisms for mapping between X.400 and RFC 822 email addressing and message formats.
  • C. RFC 1446
    RFC 1446 is an early Internet standards document that defined mechanisms for managing network devices using the Simple Network Management Protocol (SNMP) before being superseded by later revisions.
  • D. RFC 1449
    RFC 1449 is an early Internet standards document that specified a version of the Simple Network Management Protocol (SNMP) used for managing devices on IP networks.
  • E. RFC 1497
    RFC 1497 is an early Internet standards document that defined vendor-specific extensions for the BOOTP protocol, laying groundwork later incorporated into DHCP.
  • F. None of above.
  • G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69ca832b56948190ba751cec255308f1 completed March 30, 2026, 2:05 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69cc46dc23448190a5eb63455578427e completed March 31, 2026, 10:12 p.m.
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) batch_69cef33f0aa0819091e101f822c53c0f completed April 2, 2026, 10:52 p.m.
Created at: March 30, 2026, 6:24 p.m.