Triple
T8583748
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Adidas Telstar 18 |
E203249
|
entity |
| Predicate | graphicsTheme |
P82972
|
FINISHED |
| Object | pixelated design |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: pixelated design | Statement: [Adidas Telstar 18, graphicsTheme, pixelated design]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: graphicsTheme Context triple: [Adidas Telstar 18, graphicsTheme, pixelated design]
-
A.
indicatorTheme
Indicates that something serves as a thematic indicator or signal for a particular topic, concept, or condition.
-
B.
themeFor
Indicates that something serves as the central subject, topic, or focus for another thing (such as an event, work, or activity).
-
C.
themeExamples
Indicates that the related entity serves as an example or illustration of the theme expressed by the subject.
-
D.
graphics
Indicates a relationship where one entity is responsible for creating, providing, or handling visual representations or graphical content for another entity or context.
-
E.
themeContrast
Indicates a relationship where two themes are compared or opposed to highlight their differences or tension.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69ca8329bb7c8190a63c643730839103 |
completed | March 30, 2026, 2:05 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69cbeb1ecc188190bbe2ab8d2423505b |
completed | March 31, 2026, 3:41 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69cbd11b13108190b07f8f161425a585 |
completed | March 31, 2026, 1:50 p.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69cbe12dd0b88190a38ec4d15dcc870b |
completed | March 31, 2026, 2:58 p.m. |
Created at: March 30, 2026, 6:22 p.m.