Triple

T857963
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Frege’s system in "Grundgesetze der Arithmetik" E18534 entity
Predicate paradoxType P20234 FINISHED
Object set-theoretic paradox of the extension of the concept "not self-membered" LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: set-theoretic paradox of the extension of the concept "not self-membered" | Statement: [Frege’s system in "Grundgesetze der Arithmetik", paradoxType, set-theoretic paradox of the extension of the concept "not self-membered"]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: paradoxType
Context triple: [Frege’s system in "Grundgesetze der Arithmetik", paradoxType, set-theoretic paradox of the extension of the concept "not self-membered"]
  • A. conflictType
    Indicates the specific kind or category of conflict that characterizes the relationship or interaction between entities.
  • B. parity
    Indicates that two quantities share the same evenness or oddness, or more generally that they have equivalent status or value in a given context.
  • C. disputedAspect
    Indicates that a particular feature, detail, or component of something is subject to disagreement or contention between parties.
  • D. antagonistOf
    Indicates a relationship where one entity actively opposes, conflicts with, or serves as an adversary to another.
  • E. challengedConcept
    Indicates that one entity has questioned, disputed, or called into doubt the validity, accuracy, or applicability of a particular concept.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69a4938bdd3c8190a954a3c11844d9cf completed March 1, 2026, 7:29 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69a4ac4f740881909cb59a6c18a77af3 completed March 1, 2026, 9:14 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69a4aa834a588190bca4a0eb83fb3eb6 completed March 1, 2026, 9:07 p.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69a4ab498bb0819080e3afb684b504b6 completed March 1, 2026, 9:10 p.m.
Created at: March 1, 2026, 7:39 p.m.