Triple
T8570724
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Osborne 1 |
E202917
|
entity |
| Predicate | parallelPorts |
P34282
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Centronics-compatible printer port |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Centronics-compatible printer port | Statement: [Osborne 1, parallelPorts, Centronics-compatible printer port]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: parallelPorts Context triple: [Osborne 1, parallelPorts, Centronics-compatible printer port]
-
A.
midiPorts
Indicates a relationship where one entity exposes or uses one or more MIDI input/output ports associated with another entity.
-
B.
hasPorts
chosen
Indicates that an entity is equipped with or provides access points (ports) for connection, communication, or interface with other entities or systems.
-
C.
pins
Indicates that one entity fastens, secures, or immobilizes another entity in place, typically using a pin-like object or mechanism.
-
D.
hasUSBPort
Indicates that one entity is equipped with or includes a USB port available for connection or data/power transfer.
-
E.
dataPinCount
Indicates the number of data pins associated with or used by an entity in a given context.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69ca8327b0a881908606ff860713964d |
completed | March 30, 2026, 2:05 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69cbea4223888190a56d9026ae0b9ec0 |
completed | March 31, 2026, 3:37 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69cbd11856048190a1ce4b83a38f6965 |
completed | March 31, 2026, 1:50 p.m. |
Created at: March 30, 2026, 6:21 p.m.