Triple
T8568129
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Oh, Pretty Woman |
E202858
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasRhythmPattern |
P7864
|
FINISHED |
| Object | syncopated guitar rhythm |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: syncopated guitar rhythm | Statement: [Oh, Pretty Woman, hasRhythmPattern, syncopated guitar rhythm]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasRhythmPattern Context triple: [Oh, Pretty Woman, hasRhythmPattern, syncopated guitar rhythm]
-
A.
hasRhythmicStyle
chosen
Indicates that one entity exhibits or is characterized by a particular rhythmic pattern or style in its expression or behavior.
-
B.
hasRhythmicOrigin
Indicates that something originates from, is derived from, or is fundamentally based on rhythm or rhythmic patterns.
-
C.
rhythmicOrganization
Indicates how temporal patterns, accents, and durations are structured or arranged in relation to one another within a sequence or system.
-
D.
hasRhythmSection
Indicates that an entity (such as a musical group or piece) includes or is associated with a rhythm section component.
-
E.
hasBPMApprox
Indicates an approximate beats-per-minute (BPM) value associated with an entity, rather than an exact measured tempo.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69ca8327b0a881908606ff860713964d |
completed | March 30, 2026, 2:05 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69cbe9d5d4ac8190a4d74c88b872d0b7 |
completed | March 31, 2026, 3:35 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69cbd11856048190a1ce4b83a38f6965 |
completed | March 31, 2026, 1:50 p.m. |
Created at: March 30, 2026, 6:21 p.m.