Triple

T8549498
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Mullaippāṭṭu E202409 entity
Predicate tinai P83263 FINISHED
Object mullai tinai LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: mullai tinai | Statement: [Mullaippāṭṭu, tinai, mullai tinai]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: tinai
Context triple: [Mullaippāṭṭu, tinai, mullai tinai]
  • A. via
    Indicates that something occurs, is achieved, or is connected by means of, through the use of, or along the route of another entity or medium.
  • B. tonal
    Indicates that one entity has a tone, pitch pattern, or tonal quality in relation to another (such as a language, sound, or musical element).
  • C. inker
    Indicates that one entity serves as the inker for another, typically applying ink to finalize or enhance an existing drawing or artwork.
  • D. tackles
    Indicates that one entity forcefully brings another entity to the ground or physically stops their movement, typically in a competitive or confrontational context.
  • E. aria
    Indicates that an entity is associated with ARIA (Accessible Rich Internet Applications) attributes or roles that define how it should be interpreted by assistive technologies.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69ca832610e08190b3b6c6cd2c250255 completed March 30, 2026, 2:05 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69cbe753d3608190b0573477182cf194 completed March 31, 2026, 3:25 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69cbd113e05c81908f4f3fc1b5925164 completed March 31, 2026, 1:50 p.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69cbe30d453481908f897ed2b06e7534 completed March 31, 2026, 3:06 p.m.
Created at: March 30, 2026, 6:19 p.m.