Triple
T8549497
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Mullaippāṭṭu |
E202409
|
entity |
| Predicate | poeticConvention |
P64255
|
FINISHED |
| Object | tinai classification |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: tinai classification | Statement: [Mullaippāṭṭu, poeticConvention, tinai classification]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: poeticConvention Context triple: [Mullaippāṭṭu, poeticConvention, tinai classification]
-
A.
poeticStructure
Indicates a relationship where one entity defines, embodies, or specifies the formal poetic organization (such as meter, rhyme scheme, or stanza pattern) used by another entity.
-
B.
poeticStyle
chosen
Indicates the stylistic or formal manner in which something is expressed in poetry, such as its structure, tone, and linguistic features.
-
C.
hasPoeticDevice
Indicates that one entity (typically a text or passage) employs or contains a specific poetic device present in the other entity.
-
D.
languageOfPoetry
Indicates that a specified language is the language in which a given piece of poetry is written or expressed.
-
E.
poem
Indicates that one entity is a poem created, authored, or associated with another entity.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69ca832610e08190b3b6c6cd2c250255 |
completed | March 30, 2026, 2:05 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69cbe753d3608190b0573477182cf194 |
completed | March 31, 2026, 3:25 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69cbd113e05c81908f4f3fc1b5925164 |
completed | March 31, 2026, 1:50 p.m. |
Created at: March 30, 2026, 6:19 p.m.