Triple

T8545251
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Dolly Talbo E202303 entity
Predicate hasRelationshipTypeWithCollinFenwick P83239 FINISHED
Object surrogate mother LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: surrogate mother | Statement: [Dolly Talbo, hasRelationshipTypeWithCollinFenwick, surrogate mother]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasRelationshipTypeWithCollinFenwick
Context triple: [Dolly Talbo, hasRelationshipTypeWithCollinFenwick, surrogate mother]
  • A. hasFamilialTieTo
    Indicates a relationship where two entities are connected by family bonds, such as by blood, marriage, or adoption.
  • B. relationshipToHarveyCheyneJr
    Indicates the specific familial, social, or professional relationship that an entity has to Harvey Cheyne Jr.
  • C. relationshipTypeWithStaceyColbert
    Indicates the specific nature or category of relationship that an entity has with Stacey Colbert.
  • D. inRelationshipWith
    Indicates that two entities are mutually involved in a defined personal, romantic, or partnership relationship with each other.
  • E. relationshipWithSybilFawlty
    Indicates the type or nature of a relationship that an entity has with Sybil Fawlty.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69ca832461e88190a654c5e44e233aa8 completed March 30, 2026, 2:05 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69cbe6e4e21c8190afcbca73713a5fa8 completed March 31, 2026, 3:23 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69cbd113e05c81908f4f3fc1b5925164 completed March 31, 2026, 1:50 p.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69cbe30d453481908f897ed2b06e7534 completed March 31, 2026, 3:06 p.m.
Created at: March 30, 2026, 6:18 p.m.