Triple
T8540494
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Jacques Le Gris |
E202181
|
entity |
| Predicate | legalProcedure |
P7077
|
FINISHED |
| Object | trial by combat |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: trial by combat | Statement: [Jacques Le Gris, legalProcedure, trial by combat]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: legalProcedure Context triple: [Jacques Le Gris, legalProcedure, trial by combat]
-
A.
legalProcedureUsed
chosen
Indicates that a particular legal procedure or process is applied or employed in relation to a case, action, or legal matter.
-
B.
procedureLaw
Indicates that one entity establishes, defines, or is governed by the legal procedures or procedural rules applicable to another entity or situation.
-
C.
relatedLegalProcess
Indicates that there is an associated legal proceeding or action that is connected to, arises from, or is otherwise relevant to the referenced entity or event.
-
D.
legalTool
Indicates a relationship where something functions as a legal instrument, mechanism, or means used to achieve or regulate a legal purpose or outcome.
-
E.
legalCase
Indicates a relationship where a formal legal dispute or proceeding exists between parties, typically adjudicated by a court or similar authority.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69ca832461e88190a654c5e44e233aa8 |
completed | March 30, 2026, 2:05 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69cbe6dfb2bc8190a41e32eca3c824c2 |
completed | March 31, 2026, 3:23 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69cbd111bf988190be98c92a607c6456 |
completed | March 31, 2026, 1:50 p.m. |
Created at: March 30, 2026, 6:18 p.m.